Platform
PricingContactSee what you'd save
See what you'd save
Flagship report

The Retail Workforce Efficiency Benchmark.

Our signature owned dataset: how retail chains compare on labour cost-to-sales, roster-to-demand fit and forecast accuracy, by format and size. Headline figures are published here on-page; the full report goes deeper.

12-16%
typical range of labour cost as a share of sales across retail formats
20-35%
of scheduled hours commonly mis-timed against demand in chains before optimisation
4-13%
labour cost-to-sales reduction seen after demand-matched rostering
<70%
forecast accuracy of flat-template planning at the daypart level, versus 90%+ with learned models
What is inside

Where you stand, and where the best stores are.

The benchmark exists so targets are grounded in what comparable chains actually achieve, rather than a generic ideal. Publishing key figures openly is deliberate: useful data earns trust.

  • Labour cost-to-sales distributions by format and store size
  • Roster-to-demand fit, and the typical size of the mis-timing gap
  • Forecast accuracy benchmarks: flat templates versus learned models
  • How the highest-performing quartile organises store labour
  • A self-assessment so you can locate your estate in the distribution
Get the full report

Send it to my inbox

One short form. We will email the report and occasional benchmark updates. Unsubscribe any time.

Prefer not to share details? The headline figures above are free to use with attribution.

References

Sources and further reading

External links are provided for reference and do not imply endorsement. Figures attributed to StoreCadence are indicative; each rollout is measured against your own agreed baseline.

Want your own numbers, not just the benchmark?

A no-obligation efficiency scan places your estate in the benchmark and shows the saving on the table. Built on your own data.

No obligationBuilt on your own dataA clear business case
Prefer to talk first?
The StoreCadence team
Replies within one business day